![]() ![]() You don't pay staff, massive electric bills, huge internet connections, health insurance, business taxes, retirement plans, replacing failed drives, security, a building, maintenance, r&d, and other lights on costs. It really isn't, backblaze themselves said the margins were fairly low at $5/tb. Though actually using the cloud to backup important files (not torrents) likely wouldn't be that much. ISP data restrictions only make the problem worseĪs it would for most. I don't do online backup (& never have) because it's more affordable to run my own backup system. Shunned? Hypocrisy? Do you even know what those words mean?įyi, people who act entitled often don't. There are farrrrrrr fewer windows hoarders. You're just an OS-ist hater who believes in stereotypes and supports discrimination against minorities who fight for equality. I could EXPAND my storage by 8TB every month for less than $200/mo. (Keep in mind my stored data is NOT rapidly growing.)Ī company buying in bulk and running newer systems with a higher storage density would certainly spend even less than that. I'm more than happy to not spend my money on companies that don't meet my needs.Īll things considered it costs me WAY less $5/mo to do it myself. Sure I'd like unlimited backup, but I'm happy to keep doing what I have been until such time that it exists. ISP data restrictions only make the problem worse. Point is: Windows hoarders are welcome to (ab)use the service, but responsible Linux users are shunned. People like you literally killed off nice services like ACD and crashplan personal because you abused the shit out of them. Stop being so fucking entitled thinking a company owes you unrealistically cheap storage.Įdit: I apologize for the harsh language but I'm sick of seeing such entitlement out of some people. ![]() ![]() I'm sure there are windows based hoarders who are costing them money, but it wouldn't be the deluge they'd get if they opened up linux. It turns out most people who hoard are using linux based systems, so it's an easy discriminator to keep people who abuse the service off it. So tell me how spending $200 a month on your storage is profitable when only charging $5? How can you not see that storing 40 terabytes for $5 a month isn't realistic? True cost of storage is about $5 per terabyte. The $5 unlimited plan disappeaes and the home line would blend with b2, and it becomes am ala carte like b2. Cost would be around $5 per terabyte stored. They raise prices/go to a tiered data plan. If they all of a sudden started allowing linux clients to dump like they do in b2 then you would see one of two things happen. The $5 a month "unlimited" works because utilization is low. Here, I’ll introduce you some popular software based on its features, convenience and price.So build a windows machine, do it and shut the fuck up, you entitled brat. Honestly, the most suitable one is the best, so it depends on your situation. What’s the best alternative to Backblaze? You may have this doubt. You can use it as a reference and find the most suitable software for you. In the following, I’ll show you some Backblaze alternatives, which has similar features with Backblaze. Because one Backblaze account is limited to one computer. But it’s not ideal for people who has multiple computers. What’s more, it only costs $60 every year. Besides, it protects your account via two factor verification, SMS & Authenticator Apps. Also, it allows you to get data back through web and mobile apps, even by email. It has the fastest backup speed and does not limit on the size of your files, including videos. And here are some features for Backblaze you may be interested in.īackblaze is highly recommended for many people who want an affordable and easy solution to automatically backup files to the cloud. Backblaze is the best value in cloud backup service and it’s economical, fast, reliable and easy-to-use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |